In this paper, we study the distributed convex-concave finite-sum minimax optimization over the network, and a decentralized variance-reduced optimistic gradient method with stochastic mini-batch sizes (DIVERSE) is proposed.

Despite the popularity of the Adam optimizer in practice, most theoretical analyses study Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) as a proxy for Adam, and little is known about how the solutions found by Adam differ. In this paper, we show that Adam implicitly reduces a unique form of sharpness measure shaped by its adaptive updates, leading to qualitatively different solutions from SGD. More specifically, when the training loss is small, Adam wanders around the manifold of minimizers and takes semi-gradients to minimize this sharpness measure in an adaptive manner, a behavior we rigorously characterize through a continuous-time approximation using stochastic differential equations. We further demonstrate how this behavior differs from that of SGD in a well-studied setting: when training overparameterized models with label noise, SGD has been shown to minimize the trace of the Hessian matrix, tr(H), whereas we prove that Adam minimizes tr(Diag(H)1/2) instead. In solving sparse linear regression with diagonal linear networks, this distinction enables Adam to achieve better sparsity and generalization than SGD. Finally, our analysis framework extends beyond Adam to a broad class of adaptive gradient methods, including RMSProp, Adam-mini, Adalayer and Shampoo, and provides a unified perspective on how these adaptive optimizers reduce sharpness, which we hope will offer insights for future optimizer design.

We introduce the Riemannian Proximal Sampler, a method for sampling from densities defined on Riemannian manifolds. The performance of this sampler critically depends on two key oracles: the Manifold Brownian Increments (MBI) oracle and the Riemannian Heat-kernel (RHK) oracle. We establish high-accuracy sampling guarantees for the Riemannian Proximal Sampler, showing that generating samples with ε-accuracy requires O(log(1/ε)) iterations in Kullback-Leibler divergence assuming access to exact oracles and O(log2(1/ε))iterations in the total variation metric assuming access to sufficiently accurate inexact oracles.

Theoretical works on supervised transfer learning (STL)--where the learner has access to labeled samples from both source and target distributions--have for the most part focused on statistical aspects of the problem, while efficient optimization has received less attention. We consider the problem of designing an SGD procedure for STL that alternates sampling between source and target data, while maintaining statistical transfer guarantees without prior knowledge of the quality of the source data. A main algorithmic difficulty is in understanding how to design such an adaptive sub-sampling mechanism at each SGD step, to automatically gain from the source when it is informative, or bias towards the target and avoid negative transfer when the source is less informative. We show that, such a mixed-sample SGD procedure is feasible for general prediction tasks with convex losses, rooted in tracking an abstract sequence of constrained convex programs that serve to maintain the desired transfer guarantees. We instantiate these results in the concrete setting of linear regression with square loss, and show that the procedure converges, with 1/ T rate, to a solution whose statistical performance on the target is adaptive to the a priori unknown quality of the source. Experiments with synthetic and real datasets support the theory.

Motivated by applications such as cloud platforms allocating GPUs to users or governments deploying mobile health units across competing regions, we study the constrained dynamic allocation of a reusable resource to a group of strategic agents. Our objective is to simultaneously (i) maximize social welfare, (ii) satisfy multidimensional long-term cost constraints, and (iii) incentivize truthful reporting. We begin by numerically evaluating primal-dual methods widely used in constrained online optimization and find them to be highly fragile in strategic settings - agents can easily manipulate their reports to distort future dual updates for future gain. To address this vulnerability, we develop an incentive-aware framework that makes primal-dual methods robust to strategic behavior. Our primal-side design combines epoch-based lazy updates - discouraging agents from distorting dual updates - with dual-adjust pricing and randomized exploration techniques that extract approximately truthful signals for learning. On the dual side, we design a novel online learning subroutine to resolve a circular dependency between actions and predictions; this makes our mechanism achieve eO( T)social welfare regret (where T is the number of allocation rounds), satisfies all cost constraints, and ensures incentive alignment. This eO( T) performance matches that of non-strategic allocation approaches while additionally exhibiting robustness to strategic agents.

Large generative models are increasingly trained on synthetic data from earlier generations, raising concerns about model collapse, a progressive performance decline consistently observed in empirical studies. However, theoretical understanding of recursive training dynamics and their failure modes remains limited. In this work, we theoretically show that recursive training inherently leads to exponential error growth unless mitigated by sufficient real data. Addressing the growing scarcity of real data, we introduce a self-verification mechanism enabling models to filter their outputs based on internal confidence scores without external validation. Through rigorous analysis, we derive finite-sample error bounds demonstrating that self-verification alone can prevent collapse, even in fully synthetic training regimes. Our theoretical framework extends to large language models (LLMs), characterizing the conditions under which recursive training can maintain stability without performance degradation.

We study contextual bandits in the stochastic i.i.d.\ setting, where a learner observes contexts drawn from an unknown distribution, selects actions from a finite set $A$, and aims to identify an approximately optimal policy from a given class based on bandit feedback. Motivated by bandit multiclass classification with zero-one rewards, we focus on the \emph{$s$-sparse} setting in which, for every context, the reward vector has $L_1$-norm at most $s \ll |A|$. Our main result is the design of algorithms that, with high probability, output an $ε$-optimal policy compared to policy class $Π$ using $\tilde{O} ((s/ε^2 + |A|/ε)\log |Π|/δ)$ samples. We extend this bound to general Natarajan classes and complement it with a matching lower bound (up to logarithmic factors), thereby closing a substantial gap left by prior work (Erez et al., 2024, 2025), which incurred an additional $Θ(|A|^9)$ dependence. We obtain these results via two complementary approaches. First, we analyze contextual bandits through the lens of contextual decision making with structured observations, designing an exploration-by-optimization algorithm whose sample complexity is governed by the \emph{decision-estimation coefficient} (DEC; Foster et al., 2021, 2022). We show that, with $s$-sparse rewards, the induced model class admits a sharp DEC bound that scales with $s$ and directly yields the optimal rate. Since this approach is largely information-theoretic and involves solving complex min-max optimization problems, we also develop a second, more specialized algorithmic method based on a low-variance exploration technique. This approach leads to concrete, tractable algorithms and naturally extends to contextual combinatorial semi-bandits, leading to improved sample complexity guarantees for bandit multiclass list classification.

Reinforcement learning with multinomial logistic (MNL) function approximation has become an important framework due to its flexibility and broad applicability. While existing studies have established regret guarantees under worst-case analysis, they do not capture how performance depends on the variability of the interaction between the learner and the environment. In this paper, we develop a new theoretical analysis for MNL-based Markov decision processes that yields explicit variance-adaptive regret bounds. Our algorithm is computationally efficient and achieves the instance-wise optimal rate of regret, narrowing the gap between upper and lower bounds. Our numerical experiments validate that our method learns optimal policies more efficiently than conventional approaches.

We establish maximal concentration bounds for the iterates generated by stochastic approximation algorithms with general step sizes, where the noise has a finite-state Markovian component plus a Martingale-difference component. When the Martingale-difference noise is bounded, we show that the tail of the error can be sub-Gaussian, sub-Weibull, or something lighter than any Pareto but heavier than any Weibull, depending on the step size sequence and on whether the random operator is almost surely contractive, almost surely non-expansive, or expansive with positive probability. Our analysis relies on a novel Lyapunov function involving the moment-generating function of the solution to a Poisson equation, together with an auxiliary projected algorithm. We complement the upper bounds with worst-case examples showing that qualitatively sharper bounds are impossible. We further study the case of unbounded Martingale-difference noise when the average operator is contractive, and the step sizes are of order $1/k$. In this setting, we show that if the random operator is almost surely non-expansive, then the error tail is at most three times heavier than the noise tail, whereas if the random operator is expansive with positive probability, then the error may have substantially heavier tails. These results are obtained through a novel black-box truncation argument that reduces the unbounded-noise setting to the bounded-noise case.